Home
> Commentary, Politics/Policy > Public Polling and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (A nerd two-fer!)
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
Leave a comment
Trackback
Portfolio
- About Me
- Business School Cases
- Criticism
- Boardwalk Empire: “21”
- Breaking Bad: “Face Off”
- Community: “Competitive Ecology”
- Cougar Town: “Ain’t Love Strange”
- How I Met Your Mother: “Legendaddy”
- How I Met Your Mother: “The Best Man” / “The Naked Truth”
- Justified: “Reckoning”
- Modern Family: “Boys’ Night”
- Parks and Recreation: “Born and Raised”
- Parks and Recreation: “Harvest Festival”
- Q&A: Amber Benson
- Q&A: Bill Lawrence
- Revenge: “Infamy”
- Ringer: “Pilot”
- Test Pilot: Batman (1966)
- Test Pilot: K Street
- Test Pilot: Thirtysomething
- The Good Wife: “Alienation of Affection”
- The Office: “Lotto”
- The Walking Dead: “What Lies Ahead”
- Marketing & Copywriting
- Newsletters
- Published Writing
Archive by category
My Other Projects
- LinkedIn Profile Resume / Profile
- Stratford-On-Hellmouth Bringing together the Bard of Avon and the King of Geeks (a joint project with many sharp-minded folks)
- The Vast Wasteland My TV criticism from ChicagoNow.com
- This Was Television Flipping through television’s past
- TV Tandem Podcast A podcast dedicated to over-thinking TV & other pop culture, with Julie Hammerle
Archives
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (9)
- April 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (7)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (7)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (5)
Friends of the Blog
- A Helpless Compiler – Les Chappell
- Bloglander – Daniel Walters
- Getting In Tune – Chris Castaneda
- Hammervision – Julie & John Hammerle
- Monsters of Television – Noel Kirkpatrick et al.
- Pop Tortes – Andrew Daar
- PopMatters – Michelle Welch
- Renaissance Gamer – Rowan Kaiser
- The A.V. Club
- Tim's Automotive Blog – Tim Healey
- Traveling Preacher – Matthew Keadle
- TV Surveillance – Cory Barker
Join 4 other subscribers
Public Polling and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (A nerd two-fer!)
On Twitter, Steve Silberman links to a new report showing that only 52% of Americans know that vaccines don’t cause autism. As another Twitterer points out, the veracity of online surveys is always tough to measure, since they tend to be self-selecting. But it raises another question for me, one I haven’t seen addressed very much: Does the very nature of polling people about empirical facts make them more likely to think that the topic is more subjective than it really is? That is, is there a Heisenberg effect in polling, whereby one cannot effectively measure public opinion without also shaping it?
A lot of noteworthy polls in the last few years fall into this category. The proven, incontrovertible facts about which the American public is regularly queried include whether anthropomorphic climate change is real and whether the President of the United States is a Muslim/Marxist/foreigner/take-your-pick. The so-called debate about autism fits more closely with the former subject than the latter, in that accepting the reality depends on at least a passing understanding of, and trust in, science. But all of these questions are about cold hard truths, not preferential matters like taxes or immigration policy.
Polling, however, is much more commonly deployed to gauge belief rather than knowledge. Is it possible that respondents make this association (polling = opinion) so easily, and so subtly, that when a question is posed to them in that format they naturally suspect the topic is a subjective one?
Of course, there are going to be hardcore true believers who need no such encouragement to cling to their conspiracy-addled worldviews. But many more people are bombarded by conflicting and disreputable information and unsure what to think. Could the very fact of continuing to ask whether humans cause climate change, or whether vaccines cause autism, introduce just enough doubt to grant the deniers broader acceptance than should be tolerable in an educated society?
I have no idea whether this is true or even plausible, but like I said it’s something I haven’t seen discussed, and I’d be curious to know if any studies have been done touching on it.
Share this:
Like this:
Related