Home
> Commentary, Literature, Pop Culture > Anti-Superman screeds are wrong – but not because Superman’s fictional
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
Leave a comment
Trackback
Portfolio
- About Me
- Business School Cases
- Criticism
- Boardwalk Empire: “21”
- Breaking Bad: “Face Off”
- Community: “Competitive Ecology”
- Cougar Town: “Ain’t Love Strange”
- How I Met Your Mother: “Legendaddy”
- How I Met Your Mother: “The Best Man” / “The Naked Truth”
- Justified: “Reckoning”
- Modern Family: “Boys’ Night”
- Parks and Recreation: “Born and Raised”
- Parks and Recreation: “Harvest Festival”
- Q&A: Amber Benson
- Q&A: Bill Lawrence
- Revenge: “Infamy”
- Ringer: “Pilot”
- Test Pilot: Batman (1966)
- Test Pilot: K Street
- Test Pilot: Thirtysomething
- The Good Wife: “Alienation of Affection”
- The Office: “Lotto”
- The Walking Dead: “What Lies Ahead”
- Marketing & Copywriting
- Newsletters
- Published Writing
Archive by category
My Other Projects
- LinkedIn Profile Resume / Profile
- Stratford-On-Hellmouth Bringing together the Bard of Avon and the King of Geeks (a joint project with many sharp-minded folks)
- The Vast Wasteland My TV criticism from ChicagoNow.com
- This Was Television Flipping through television’s past
- TV Tandem Podcast A podcast dedicated to over-thinking TV & other pop culture, with Julie Hammerle
Archives
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (9)
- April 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (7)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (7)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (5)
Friends of the Blog
- A Helpless Compiler – Les Chappell
- Bloglander – Daniel Walters
- Getting In Tune – Chris Castaneda
- Hammervision – Julie & John Hammerle
- Monsters of Television – Noel Kirkpatrick et al.
- Pop Tortes – Andrew Daar
- PopMatters – Michelle Welch
- Renaissance Gamer – Rowan Kaiser
- The A.V. Club
- Tim's Automotive Blog – Tim Healey
- Traveling Preacher – Matthew Keadle
- TV Surveillance – Cory Barker
Join 4 other subscribers
Anti-Superman screeds are wrong – but not because Superman’s fictional
The hysterical kerfuffle over the latest issue of Action Comics, in which Superman renounces his American citizenship, has predictably inspired a huge amount of jingoistic blathering. And of course there have been plenty of calm, well-reasoned rebuttals from people who actually understand the point of the story and who aren’t, y’know, morons.
But one counter-argument I’ve heard around the Twittersphere – partly in jest, partly not – basically amounts to, “Calm down, Superman’s not real.” There are many valid reasons to reject the anti-Superman screeds, but this isn’t one of them. If you believe that fiction has a serious role to play in demonstrating and shaping societal values, then it’s perfectly reasonable to be angered by a work of fiction that seems to spit in the face of the values you cherish – or worse, one you once regarded as sharing your values which suddenly seems to upend or reject them.
This is doubly true of an iconic character like Superman, who is as potent and lasting a mythological figure as American culture has ever produced. More than any other superhero – probably more than any fictional character we’ve birthed – he has been a model for the better angels of human nature. He’s lasted as more than a kid’s comic book figure because of the high ideals he represents. Existing only in ink and paper doesn’t diminish the real-world importance of those ideals; and that means any complication, alteration, or subversion of those values (all of which are inherently subjective) is fair game for an honest emotional response.
To put it another way, remove the context of the citizenship issue. Suppose DC released an issue of Action Comics in which Supes straight-up murders a bunch of bad guys – chucks them off buildings, mows them down with his heat vision, what have you. Intelligent, rational readers everywhere would be fucking furious, and rightly so – it would be an utter obliteration of one of the character’s most fundamental values: unyielding respect for human life. That none of those deaths really happened would be entirely beside the point.
Basically, you can’t have it both ways: If we can be inspired by a character’s positive attributes, we can be incensed by his negative ones. Either you believe fictional actions have a real meaning, or you don’t.
Share this:
Like this:
Related